All Channels
Popular
CRank: 5Score: 59100

A GT5 article with no trolls after 22 minutes? I was getting worried.

5677d ago 13 agree0 disagreeView comment

Even Wikipedia agrees with you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

5678d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Is this the article you're referring to ( http://n4g.com/news/647406/... )?

I do see a few "lazy devs" comments there, but not nearly as much as "PS3 sucks" and "360 spanks PS3" comments. Fanboys will be fanboys. Also R* is a terrible example to demonstrate your point.

5678d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

What's a unique user?

5680d ago 14 agree0 disagreeView comment

Could you please explain to me the logic of comparing a virtual currency with a controller? I would understand if it was Move vs Kinect or MS Points vs PSN cards, but you are comparing completely different products with different purposes. MS points are used to purchase a variety of goods from the online marketplace, while Move is used for motion gaming alone.

It's as if the president of Toyota went to a board meeting and said "Ok, in 2011 we are going to sell more c...

5680d ago 11 agree0 disagreeView comment

...

5681d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

Ohhh Strikey... Still trolling GT5 articles and then telling people not to mention Forza 3 because they don't know what they're talking about if they haven't played it?

To me, the basics in a racer is the racing and not the ability to change rims, which would be the extras. And I would love to try GT5's basics if you would be kind enough to lend me your copy.

Edit @ Jeremy - Quit fooling yourself. Changing rims is nothing more than a cosmetic ...

5681d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

And what's the lesson to be learned here? Don't let other people tell you what your opinion should be. Try it yourself and make up your own damn mind. If people were all the same, there would be no wars.

One game that I think got really unfair reviews recently is Time Crisis: Razing Storm. If you enjoyed light gun shooters in the arcades during the mid 90s, you will enjoy this game.

5684d ago 16 agree2 disagreeView comment

@ Strikepackage Bravo:

"... please STFU about FM3 if you dont know WTF your talking about!"

And when you talk about GT5, do you do it out of your extensive experience? You must have played a lot of GT5, to be in a position that allows you to claim Forza's damage is better. Try following your own advice fu***** hypocrite.

EDIT - And just for good measure, here's one of those Forza 3 glitches that you've never seen, so the...

5685d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

That actually makes sense, considering it took Turn 10 an extra year to bring us the full version of Forza 3.

5685d ago 12 agree2 disagreeView comment

So FM3 is "officially" better because it has the Veyron's cockpit and customizable rims on every car, although it doesn't feature night and rainy conditions, rally tracks, the largest selection of cars in the genre, a track editor or even a better damage system? We're still talking about RACING games here, right? Not about a car design program?

Who was the sad little troll that declared it official?

Oh, never mind...

5685d ago 17 agree2 disagreeView comment

You get all worked up because you can't customize the rims on all cars in GT5 (even though you can still change them), and it doesn't bother you that Forza 3 has no rain or night racing? Hypocrite much? Your comment history reveals your true colors. Go play with Skittles.

People like you are the reason we need the open zone back. The mods will let anything fly on the PS3 channel.

5685d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

PD probably thought that dynamic day/night cycle, variable weather and a track editor were more important than custom rims on every car. That sounds like a pretty good excuse, considering they did not have unlimited resources. I doubt their budget came anywhere near half a billion dollars.

5685d ago 18 agree1 disagreeView comment

Ha ha, that made me laugh. Bubbles for both of you.

5685d ago 20 agree2 disagreeView comment

I seriously doubt Black Ops can be considered as an example of Sony's vision on stereoscopic 3D. GT5 and Killzone 3 are probably more representative of Sony's "own 3D game".

On topic: the Xbox 360 was clearly the lead platform for Black Ops, and it shows. Developers spent the most time with it, leaving the PS3 and PC versions as an afterthought. Shadow and texture streaming glitches? Wow, just wow! It simply feels like the PC/PS3 versions were released sti...

5686d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

Hhhhhmmmmm...

http://www.videogameszone.d...

They look the same to me. I would ask to borrow your fanboy goggles, but lets be honest here... You didn't even bother to hit the link and take a look at the screens, did you? You just came here to exercise your...

5687d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

@ Red_Orange_Juice:
Unfortunately those stickers are quite common in the PAL territories. SCEE did the exact same thing with Uncharted 2 and not even God of War III escaped that fate, despite having no online (it had a hideous sticker stating that it was fully translated in several languages).

5689d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

@ ct03 (#1.1.22):
So what are you saying exactly? That you buy hardware for the hardware and not for the games? That doesn't sound like a lot of fun. And like it or not, it's the software that drives (no pun intended) hardware sales, otherwise the Xbox would have won last gen.

Or are you saying that you don't like the current line-up of PS3 exclusives? Because what you consider an outstanding game might be barely "decent" by other people's st...

5690d ago 13 agree1 disagreeView comment

@ ct03:
You are assuming that Yamauchi believes current PC hardware is enough to "handle his vision". And even if that is the case, you're quite simply barking at the wrong tree.

There are tons of PC developers. What you should be asking is why none of them has brought a GT5 competitor to the table. You can't really blame Sony for not giving up the "precious exclusive" which THEY CREATED to increase sales of THEIR HARDWARE.

5690d ago 17 agree0 disagreeView comment

@ Quagmire - I hope this answers your question:

5693d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment